Selective Sharing is Caring: Toward the Design of A Collaborative Tool to Facilitate Team Sharing

This paper reports on a study utilizing 89 participants engaging in real-world temporary teams to better understand user perceptions of sharing personal information. Qualitative and quantitative results revealed unique findings, including: 1) Users perceived personality and conflict management style assessments to be accurate and sharing these assessments to be helpful but had mixed perceptions regarding the appropriateness of sharing; 2) Users of the collaborative tool had higher perceptions of sharing in terms of helpfulness and appropriateness; and 3) User feedback highlighted the need for tools to selectively share fewer data with more context to improve appropriateness and helpfulness while reducing the amount of time to read.

Previous
Previous

Addressing the Spread of Trust and Distrust in Distributed Human-AI Teaming Constellations

Next
Next

Invoking Principles of Groupware to Develop and Evaluate Present and Future Human-Agent Teams